Close

Evidence for Evolution?

    Creation of Life

  1. In Nature: We have never observed non-living matter to form life in nature.
  2. In the Lab: The best scientists, labs, and universities in the world have never demonstrated they can create life from non-living matter even in a controlled lab environment. If intelligient designers (scientists) can't create life in carefully controlled lab conditions, is it reasonable to believe that non-intelligient processes can create life in a hostile natural environment, where repeatable science shows water degrades RNA and DNA?
  3. Canned Goods: Every year the world produces about 80 billion cans of food. Canned goods contain proteins, amino acids, nutrients, and fragments of RNA and DNA. Yet life does not arise in them. This is experimental evidence that Louis Pastuer's Law of Abiogenesis is true - life does not come from non-life.
  4. Speculation
    Evolutionists can't explain how life got started in violation of known chemistry and math. So they resort to speculation. Speculation is not science. Examples:
  1. Many scientists THINK that life MAY HAVE started in deep-sea hydrothermal vents
  2. Other researchers SUGGEST life MIGHT HAVE originated in shallow surface pools
  3. How early Earth chemistry MIGHT HAVE supported abiogenesis
  4. Scientists BELIEVE ...
  5. MOST users on Reddit AGREE ...